Background. On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser, a Pierce County, Washington high school senior, gave a speech nominating classmate Jeff Kuhlman for Associated Student Body vice president. The speech was filled with sexual innuendos, but not obscenity, prompting disciplinary action from the administration.

What did Fraser say in Bethel v Fraser?

Fraser suspended for lewd speech Fraser for delivering a speech laced with sexual references before a student assembly. Fraser’s speech, nominating a classmate to a student elective office, referred to the student as “firm in his pants,” who would take it to “the climax.”

Why did Matthew believe his suspension was unconstitutional?

Matthew believed that he had a First Amendment right to give his speech, and sued the school. … The school argued that Matthew’s speech had clearly violated the school conduct code, and that the First Amendment did not protect Matthew’s words in public school. The case eventually went to the Supreme Court.

How old was Matthew Fraser when he gave his speech?

Matthew Fraser was a 17-year-old high school senior in a farming town near Tacoma, Wash., in April 1983 when he gave a one-minute speech that he thought would grab students’ attention. It did, and then some.

What is the Tinker test?

The substantial disruption test is a criterion set forth by the United States Supreme Court, in the leading case of Tinker v. … The test is used to determine whether an act by a U.S. public school official (State actor) has abridged a student’s constitutionally protected First Amendment rights of free speech.

Who won the Morse v Frederick case?

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment does not prevent school administrators from restricting student expression that reasonably is viewed as promoting the use of illegal drugs.

Is hate speech protected by the First Amendment?

While “hate speech” is not a legal term in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that most of what would qualify as hate speech in other western countries is legally protected free speech under the First Amendment.

Can a public school punish students for displaying a banner promoting drug use at a school sponsored event?

majority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. Yes and not reached. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit by a 5-4 vote, ruling that school officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.

When was Bethel school vs Fraser?

Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986) Public schools have the right to discipline a student for giving a speech at a school assembly that is indecent, although not obscene.

Who won Guiles v Marineau?

Conclusion: Applying the doctrine enunciated in Tinker 393 U.S. at 513, the appellate court held that the defendants’ censorship of the images on Guiles‘ T-shirt violated his free speech rights under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Article first time published on

How did the Court distinguish between the Tinker case and the Fraser case?

Fraser protested his punishment, stating that it violated the precedent established by Tinker. The Court distinguished between “political” speech that is protected under Tinker and “vulgar” speech during a school-sponsored event.

Are students protected by the First Amendment?

Public school students possess a range of free-expression rights under the First Amendment. … The U.S. Supreme Court has said that students “do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

For what reason did school officials punish Matthew Fraser after he gave his speech?

The following day, the assistant principal told Fraser that he had violated the school’s policy prohibiting the use of obscene language. As punishment, school officials suspended Fraser for three days and removed his name from the list of possible graduation commencement speakers.

What was the main issue in Hazelwood vs kuhlmeier?

Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student …

What happened in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?

In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), the Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums.

What is disruptive speech?

HOW DISRUPTIVE IS “DISRUPTIVE”? In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that student “speech” (expression) could. not be punished or stopped unless officials could prove the speech would or did cause an interference with the discipline required for the operation of the school.

What is prior restraint?

In First Amendment law, prior restraint is government action that prohibits speech or other expression before the speech happens. .

What is the Hazelwood standard?

Facts and case summary for Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988) The First Amendment rights of student journalists are not violated when school officials prevent the publication of certain articles in the school newspaper.

Can you be fired for speech?

If you are a state or federal employee, then you are protected from retaliation for exercising free speech by the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that when you exercise your right to free speech, your government employer cannot retaliate against you with negative employment action.

Does the ACLU support free speech?

The ACLU has worked since 1920 to ensure that freedom of speech is protected for everyone. “Freedom of expression is the matrix, the indispensable condition, of nearly every other form of freedom.”

Does freedom of speech apply to social media?

Current legal precedent conclusively establishes that social media users do not have a right to free speech on private social media platforms. Social media platforms are allowed to remove offending content when done in accordance with their stated policies as permitted by Sec.

Is Bong Hits for Jesus protected speech?

In Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), often referred to as the “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” case, the Supreme Court ruled that it is not a denial of the First Amendment right to free speech for public school officials to censor student speech that they reasonably believe encourages illegal drug use.

What caused the Morse v Frederick case?

Frederick, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2007, ruled (5–4) that Alaskan school officials had not violated a student’s First Amendment freedom of speech rights after suspending him for displaying, at a school event, a banner that was seen as promoting illegal drug use.

Was Morse v Frederick a landmark case?

The case, Morse v. Frederick, concerned the rights of a public school student to unfurl a banner reading “Bong hits 4 Jesus” at a school-sponsored event held off school grounds. We begin this school year with this landmark case on the rights of public school students.

How does the authors discussion of Bethel School District v Fraser contribute to the development of ideas in the text?

How does the author’s discussion of Bethel School District v. Fraser contribute to the development of ideas in the text (Paragraphs 22-23)? It suggests that the results of the Tinker case didn’t actually ensure the protection of students’ free speech in school.

What does the Constitution not protect?

Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial …

Who won Tinker vs Des Moines?

Decision: In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The high court agreed that students’ free rights should be protected and said, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”

What reason did Joseph Frederick give for displaying the banner that his principal found objectionable?

The court further concluded that Frederick’s right to display his banner was so “clearly established” that a reasonable principal in Morse’s position would have understood that her actions were unconstitutional, and that Morse was therefore not entitled to qualified immunity.

Where do most of the Supreme Court's cases come from?

The majority of the Supreme Court’s cases today are heard on appeal from the lower courts. These cases usually come from the federal courts of appeal, but the Court does sometimes hear appeals from the state Supreme Courts as well.

What exactly does the First Amendment say about religion?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

What was Fraser's argument?

By David L. Hudson Jr. This 1986 Supreme Court decision put forth the principle that public school officials can prohibit student speech that is vulgar, lewd, or plainly offensive.